Team No Comments

EPIC Investment Partners – The Daily Update

Please see the below article from EPIC Investment Partners detailing their discussions on water companies amidst growing environmental concerns. Received this afternoon 04/07/2024.

A judicial decision over 14 years in the making ended on the 2nd of July, with the Supreme Court ruling in favour of private businesses and people over United Utilities, the water company responsible for Northwest England and some six million people. This landmark ruling, with its significant implications, has opened the door for private legal actions in nuisance and trespass against water companies due to unauthorised sewage discharges and the related effects of pollution.

As early as 2010, the Manchester Ship Canal Company, owners of the 129-year-old Manchester Ship Canal, tried to bring a claim that the discharges from United Utilities 121 sewage outfalls within the canal constituted a trespass. However, United Utilities argued that the 1991 Water Industry Act, which privatised the sector, meant only regulators could act. In 2012, the high court sided with United Utilities and dismissed the claim. Despite an appeal process, the Supreme Court upheld this ruling in 2014. 

In March 2021, the High Court confirmed this, stating it was the role of regulators, not the courts, to address problems caused by sewage dumping. However, The Environmental Law Foundation, supported by the Good Law Project, challenged this decision, arguing that there should be legal options for people directly affected by sewage pollution. The case went up to the Supreme Court, which overturned previous rulings and found that United Utilities can be held accountable for damage caused by discharges. Lord Reed and Lord Hodge said: “The supreme court unanimously allows the canal company’s appeal. It holds that the 1991 act does not prevent the canal company from bringing a claim in nuisance or trespass when the canal is polluted by discharges of foul water from United Utilities’ outfalls, even if there has been no negligence or deliberate misconduct.”

In a related development, United Utilities and five other water firms have been mandated to publish live sewage discharge maps. These maps, released before a 2025 government deadline, provide real-time updates on sewage overflows, helping the public know the safety of local waters. This initiative came after significant public pressure and environmental campaigns, particularly focusing on areas like Lake Windermere, where United Utilities had a major incident of raw sewage discharge.

Following this ruling, water companies in the UK, more broadly, could face a spate of legal challenges by people and businesses affected by sewage pollution, where fines and regulatory action have previously not been enough to curtail pollution. The Good Law Project’s interim head of legal, Jennine Walker, said: “This is a sensational victory. It gives us stronger legal tools… to hold water companies to account after repeated failures from our toothless and underfunded regulators… and empowers people and businesses to use the courts to challenge industrial-scale polluters like United Utilities, who have put profits and the shareholder interest over protecting our environment.”

These events underscore the increasing regulatory and legal challenges water companies face in the UK, particularly concerning environmental protection and public transparency. United Utilities Group shares fell -2.5% yesterday, however, the wider utility complex remained broadly flat.

Please continue to check our blog content for advice, planning issues and the latest investment, market and economic updates from leading investment houses.

Alex Clare

04/07/2024

Team No Comments

Brewin Dolphin – Markets in a Minute

Please see this week’s Markets in a Minute update below from Brewin Dolphin, received yesterday afternoon – 02/07/2024.

Guy Foster, Chief Strategist, discusses the result of the first round of the French election and the impact it’s had on equity and bond markets. Plus, Janet Mui, Head of Market Analysis, examines fresh U.S. inflation data.

Markets traded broadly sideways last week, with relatively little economic news or corporate earnings results. While markets may have been quiet, there was plenty of politics for investors to ponder.

The election-heavy year continued with France hitting the polls on Sunday for the first round of legislative elections. Candidates are competing for one of 577 National Assembly deputy positions, which they’ll win if they receive 50% of votes in their constituency, representing at least 25% of registered voters.

However, if they don’t win a position, a second round will take place where voters will select one of the top three candidates who have achieved 12.5% or more of the votes. In this round, the candidate who receives the most votes is elected.

Marie Le Pen’s far-right National Rally party won 33% of the popular vote, while President Emmanuel Macron’s centrist Together coalition (which includes his Renaissance party) achieved 21%. The second round of voting takes place on Sunday.

The UK election looms…

Taking place between the two French rounds of voting is the UK general election.

The two leaders, Labour’s Sir Keir Starmer and the Conservative Party’s Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, debated last week and the consensus seems to be that the prime minister won the argument but still won’t prevail in the election.

When the election comes, the market’s reaction is likely to be muted, as a Labour victory has seemed so likely for a long time – but the margin of victory could be important.

UK elections are notoriously difficult to poll, and prediction models are producing some wildly different forecasts of the possible Labour margin of victory (from 50-150 seats). This could be due to a lack of enthusiasm for the opposition or the performance of other parties, such as Reform or the Scottish National Party.

The size of the margin gives a new prime minister a mandate and equates to their right to make decisions. If this was accompanied by a bold policy agenda, investors would react to those policies being implemented. However, as Labour’s offering has been relatively vanilla, the mandate should therefore protect the leadership from rebellions and contribute to a feeling of general political stability.

Belief in the U.S. president weakens…

More newsworthy was the first U.S. election debate on Thursday.

President Joe Biden, who has been lagging former President Donald Trump in the polls, pushed for this debate because it was seen as an opportunity to expose Trump’s weaknesses.

However, it was also recognised as a risk if Biden was to appear frail, which is exactly what happened. His voice and the dithering nature of his answers will have reinforced the suggestion he’s too old to serve another four-year term. Prediction markets immediately marked his potential chances lower, but Biden’s losses were bigger than Trump’s gains (and the gains of potential candidates Gavin Newsom and Kamala 2 July 2024 Harris). Speculation’s now mounting that Trump might end up facing a different candidate in November.

The obvious candidate would be current Vice President Kamala Harris, but there is little evidence that she would perform well against Trump. For that reason, Governor of California Gavin Newsom is the most likely pick, with a handful of other state governors also amongst the speculation. So far, they have all been firm in their commitment to Biden’s cause, so any change of candidate would need to be initiated by him deciding not to stand. The candidacy will be confirmed at the Democratic National Congress in late August.

The third-party candidates line up…

This year’s election will also feature some third-party candidates. That’s not unusual, however, their influence tends to be limited. In fact, no third-party candidate has won any Electoral College votes (effectively winning a single state) since 1968.

However, it is possible for third-party candidates to influence the election. In 1992, Ross Perot is credited with taking votes from George H. W. Bush, which ultimately helped Bill Clinton. The highest polling third-party candidate in this election, Robert F Kennedy Jr., has appeal across both voter bases, but is especially popular with the young.

Third-party candidates usually underperform on election day, although the low level of satisfaction with the big party candidates could change that.

The Green Party’s Jill Stein is also expected to run. It’s sometimes observed that her vote share in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania in the 2016 U.S. presidential election was greater than Trump’s margin of victory over Hillary Clinton in each of those states. Therefore, Clinton might have won that election had Stein not run and her supporters had instead supported Clinton (which they might not have).

Although unlikely, it’s possible that a third-party candidate wins enough Electoral College votes to prevent either Trump or Biden (or his replacement) from winning the 270 votes required to become president. Under those circumstances, the newly elected House of Representatives would select the new president on the basis that each state has a single vote (despite a state like California having 60 times the population of Wyoming).

Therefore, regardless of which party controlled the largest number of seats in Congress, the fact that there are more Republican states than Democrat states means this approach would likely favour Trump.

The debate seeming to improve Trump’s chances led to a rise in the dollar. Traders may have perceived that Trump will cause growth, inflation, or both by virtue of promised tax cuts and threatened import tariffs. However, the gains didn’t last and historically, markets have seemed to find it hard to really think through the implications of different presidents. Hardly surprising given there are so many different potential combinations of presidential and Congress control.

The Falcon Heavy lands…

The threat of higher inflation is one scenario but continued progress in the contemporary space race offers some hope for deflationists.

Elon Musk’s Falcon Heavy rocket successfully deployed the final satellite in the geostationary operational environmental satellite series (GOES-R), with the now familiar sight of its boosters landing in an upright position.

The conquest of space seems like science fiction but is believed to carry tangible economic benefits. One of these is the implementation of space-based solar power, in which energy is captured by space-based solar panels and beamed to earth in the form of microwaves for conversion to electricity. It’s also anticipated that an unmanned nuclear power plant could be built on the moon, allowing for further expansion of human influence in space, including asteroid mining.

Realistic returns from space are years away but could see enormous changes in availability of some natural resources, with knock-on effects for the countries that might currently supply them on earth.

Please continue to check our blog content for advice, planning issues and the latest investment market and economic updates from leading investment houses.

Charlotte Clarke

03/07/2024

Team No Comments

Brooks Macdonald | Daily Investment Bulletin

Please see below, the Daily Investment Bulletin from Brooks Macdonald which covers the latest news affecting global markets. Received this morning – 02/07/2024

What has happened?

Yesterday has seen some interesting moves in the US government bond market. Despite an in-line US inflation print last Friday, US 10-year bond yields still moved higher yesterday, up +6.5 basis points (bps) on Monday to 4.461% and building on its +11.0bps move up on Friday. A narrative has built up that in the aftermath of the Trump-Biden US presidential TV debate last Thursday which Trump was widely considered to have won, markets appear to be pricing in a higher probability of a Trump victory in November and with it an expectation of larger US fiscal deficits. That has also reverberated over in Europe, with government 10-year bond yields yesterday higher across the region, including UK, France, and Germany. The higher US bond yields are also rippling across FX markets, leading to a higher US dollar, which in turn is pushing the Japanese Yen to a fresh 38-year low this morning.

An early start to the Atlantic hurricane season

In the last 24 hours, currently in the Caribbean Sea, hurricane Beryl has strengthened to a Category 5 hurricane (the highest category). It is the strongest storm to ever form in the Atlantic at this time of the year. The hurricane has made landfall in several countries in the Caribbean and is moving West-Northwest. It is expected to hit south-east Mexico by the end of the week and potentially onwards into the Gulf of Mexico, home to a number of US offshore oil field operations. The US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has so far recorded maximum sustained wind speeds of 165mph, and the storm is thought to be getting stronger. Separately the NOAA has warned that the North Atlantic could get as many as seven major hurricanes this year, up from an average of three in a season. The NOAA said that record high sea surface temperatures are partly to blame, and meteorologists have this week expressed surprise as to how quickly hurricane Beryl has developed. Brent Crude oil futures are currently trading up at US$86.85 per barrel, close to 2-month highs.

 A Trump presidency looks a little more likely

On top of US President Biden’s weak showing at last week’s TV presidential debate, a Trump victory in November has been further buoyed by a decision in Trump’s favour yesterday from the US Supreme Court. The court has ruled that presidents have some immunity for their “official” acts whilst in office. With likely much legal to-and-fro now expected over what are deemed “official” acts, expectations are that the criminal trial over Trump’s attempt to overturn the 2020 election could well be delayed for a year or more, and very likely till after the US election in November.

What does Brooks Macdonald think?

The current political temperature in the US matters for markets. Should Trump win in November, he is expected to impose more tariffs on Chinese exports, an emphasis on more tax cuts, as well as pursue a US-first, likely more isolationist policies more broadly. As such, whilst current Biden has presided over a sizeable budget deficit in office already, a Trump presidency is expected by some to put incremental upward pressure on inflation expectations, and coming at a time when the US Federal Reserve is likely to be hoping to be underway in its interest rate cutting glide path.

Please continue to check our blog content for the latest advice and planning issues from leading investment firms.

Alex Kitteringham

2nd July 2024

Team No Comments

Tatton Monday Digest

Please see the ‘Monday Digest’ article below, received from Tatton Investment Management this morning. 

Tatton Monday Digest Politics, where policy takes a back seat

Last Friday marked the end of the second quarter, culminating in the day after the first 2024 US Presidential debate, widely seen as disastrous for Biden, yet financial markets have remained relatively steady. Institutional investors are currently engaged in their scheduled portfolio rebalancing, however, this time it is causing minimal disruption across asset classes. 

Thursday’s debate was anticipated to scrutinise presidential fitness rather than policy details. Biden’s disastrous performance raised concerns even among loyal Democrats, potentially jeopardising his electoral viability with any loss of voter support being very damaging.

We think betting markets show a more unbiased indicator than polls, reflecting a notable shift post-debate. Trump’s odds improved to 54.8%, a 4% gain, while Biden’s plummeted below 25%, a decline exceeding 15%. Betfair Exchange Politics indicates a 60% likelihood of Republican victory, signalling diminished prospects for Democrats if Biden remains their nominee.

Amidst debate fallout, California Governor Gavin Newsom emerged as a prominent alternative in market discussions should Democrats opt for a candidate change. The viability of such a shift hinges on internal polling and strategic calculations within the Democratic Party, which may in flux at the moment.  

Market reactions following the debate were almost blasé. US stock futures saw modest gains, contrasting with a decline in US Treasury bond prices (indicative of rising yields). The dollar also rose. International stocks were a little weaker. This implies that investors are currently expecting a slight near-term benefit for US growth should Trump win, but that it may also mean a worse budget deficit.

Looking beyond the US, global elections share common themes: aspirational manifestos mean that most important policies will not be clear until well after the elections are finished amidst heightened voter polarisation. In France the right wing did well in the first round of voting, but outright victory may be hampered in the second round by tactical voting simply to prevent the Le Pen from winning. In the UK, Labour’s centrist manifesto seems less alarming to markets, yet clarity on actual policies also remains vague.

Compared to the start of the year, global economic data remains mixed with a slight positive bias, bolstered by upward revisions in world growth forecasts. The Chinese economic policy push to bolster economic activity has driven down goods inflation, but this signals weakening domestic demand. The US shows a loss of growth momentum with slew of profit warnings from consumer-facing companies ahead of Q2 results. Consumer caution over inflation has tempered spending, impacting sectors like housing and consumer goods.

Gentle economic slowing that allows the Fed to cut rates, should lead to rebounding growth amid an otherwise stable dynamic characterised by tight labour supply driving business investment into productivity enhancing technology advancements. Europe is in a similar position although admittedly with softer underlying growth.

Looking ahead, companies broadly remain on a positive path, but market risk will continue to emanate from policy volatility uncertainties. We’ll know a bit more next week after the UK elections and possibly a lot more after the second round of the French election 

Basel III banking regulation – the Unending Endgame

Last week marked the 50th anniversary of the Herstatt Crisis, a pivotal event that triggered the establishment of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision by the G-10 nations. In 1974, Herstatt Bank’s collapse during currency trading left a $620 million loss ($400bn today) on the global banking sector, prompting G-10 nations to form the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision to mitigate such risks.

Initially overseen by the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, the committee aimed to regulate an increasingly interconnected global financial system. It took 14 years, until 1988 for Basel I, which introduced international banking regulations focusing on capital adequacy, classifying assets into risk categories and requiring banks to maintain capital equal to at least 8% of their risk-weighted assets.

It was hoped Basel I would prevent bank failures spilling into the global financial system, but it failed. The Barings Bank collapse in 1995 and the Long Term Capital Management debacle in 1998 underscored its limitations and led to Basel II. Introduced in 2004, it aimed to enhance risk management and transparency by assessing asset risks more accurately, however it also failed spectacularly to prevent the 2008 financial crisis. This led to the development of Basel III, implementation of which began in 2010 and continues, albeit slowly, with the final phase known as the “Basel III Endgame.”

Basel III extended Basel II’s focus on risk management – increasing minimum capital requirements, raising common equity levels from 2% to 4.5% of risk-weighted assets. It introduces capital buffers to absorb losses during economic stress, mandates liquidity ratios to ensure banks maintain high-quality liquid assets and imposes stricter requirements on globally significant banks.

However, Basel III places greater weight on banking regulation but not on other financial institutions such as private equity and credit firms, which are now seeing stronger equity returns. Last week US bank shares rose when the US Federal Reserve Recent announced revision to moderate the impact on large banks with sizable trading operations reducing the increases in capital adequacy to about 5% from a potential 16% rise.

In Europe, implementation has been delayed pending alignment with potential US revisions. Politics may disrupt the final outcomes as well. It is worth remembering, that Trump removed some of the regulations for US regional banks in his first term and he may seek to allow US banks more latitude.

Perhaps more likely is that the non-bank players, especially the private equity and credit firms, will seek to prevent similar regulation being applied to them, as highlighted by the Bank of England last week when it reenforced the need for international co-ordination for private equity  cross jurisdictions.

So, for the banks, “Endgame” might be applied to this Basel episode. For private equity firms, their episode will probably be called “Opening Gambit”.

The rise and fall of Ocado

Ocado, known for its distinctive green and white delivery vans and association with M&S, began in 2000 as a pioneering online grocery service in the UK. Initially praised for its innovative technology and logistics, including automated Customer Fulfilment Centres (CFCs), Ocado quickly gained market traction. Its 2010 stock market debut saw shares rise from an initial 180p to nearly 600p, buoyed by efficient operations and a partnership with Waitrose, which bolstered its IPO.

A turning point for Ocado was licensing its Smart Platform technology globally, securing deals with major retailers like Morrisons, Kroger, Casino, and Aeon. This expansion underscored Ocado’s tech prowess and potential for substantial revenue growth, reflected in its share price peak of around 2886p in 2020.


However, the grocery sector’s fierce competition and narrow margins strained Ocado, despite its technological edge. High costs associated with building and maintaining CFCs, alongside increasing competition from Amazon Fresh and traditional grocers going digital, pressured Ocado to continually innovate.

The COVID-19 pandemic briefly boosted Ocado as online grocery demand surged. However, the temporary spike strained operations and inflated costs, raising concerns about long-term sustainability post-pandemic. Analysts, including Morgan Stanley, now project prolonged cash flow challenges and debt accumulation.

Morgan Stanley’s cautious forecasts include fewer CFC deployments and heightened debt levels, signalling ongoing operational and financial hurdles for Ocado. This shift in sentiment has driven a significant decline in Ocado’s share price from its peak to just 281p last week, underscoring investor scepticism about its ability to manage these challenges effectively.

Looking ahead, Ocado must focus on cost management, margin improvement, and expanding its technological services to new markets to regain investor confidence. While its innovative approach sets it apart, navigating the competitive and cost-sensitive grocery sector remains a formidable task.

Ocado’s journey serves as a cautionary tale in the tech industry, highlighting the complexities of sustaining growth amid operational pressures and competitive forces. Its evolution underscores the volatile nature of high-growth enterprises reliant on borrowed potential, where minor shifts in profitability drivers can lead to significant market reactions.

Please check in again with us soon for further relevant content and market news.

Chloe

01/07/2024

Team No Comments

EPIC Investment Partners – The Daily Update

Please see the below article from EPIC Investment Partners detailing their thoughts on global markets and AI. Received this morning 28/06/2024.

With the UK election fast approaching, we thought we’d step away from the political arguments and negative commentary about the UK and focus on a brighter side of the economy.

The UK runs a sizeable current account deficit of just under 3% of GDP. In terms of goods exports, the UK ranks a lowly 13th place in the world, just behind Belgium.

Things would be a lot worse were it not for the UK’s sizeable surplus in services. The UK is the second largest exporter of services in the world, accounting for an impressive 7% of world service exports. A crucial driver behind this growth is the substantial investment in artificial intelligence (AI) and related technologies. According to the OECD, the UK ranks third globally, following the US and China, for venture capital invested in AI and data start-ups. This is a testament to the country’s commitment to innovation and technological advancement.

The UK’s AI sector benefits from a well-established ecosystem that includes world-renowned universities, a skilled workforce, and supportive government policies. This environment has fostered numerous successful AI start-ups and attracted significant international investment. Moreover, the UK government has been proactive in promoting AI and tech development. Initiatives like the AI Sector Deal, part of the UK’s Industrial Strategy, aim to boost AI research and application across various industries. The strategy includes substantial funding for AI research, fostering public-private partnerships, and developing a skilled workforce to support the AI sector’s growth.

The emphasis on AI and technology not only strengthens the UK’s service exports but also positions the country well for future economic challenges and opportunities. The continued investment in AI could lead to significant advancements in various sectors, including healthcare, finance, and transportation, further enhancing the UK’s competitive edge in global markets.

Talking of brighter sides, England did at least manage to top the group at the Euros. Before the competition started, we decided that our NFA result predictor should favour the Wealthy Nations. Whilst the individual results have shown mixed results, the 3*+ countries have dominated the tables. Of the 12 qualifiers who topped the six groups, 10 countries are rated 3* or better with only Spain and Portugal (both 2*) bucking the trend.

Slovakia scraped in as one of the best 3rd placed teams and are also rated 2* so, based on NFA scores, England (4*) should comfortably beat Slovakia. However, having watched England’s first three games, one might be forgiven for tempering expectations.

Please continue to check our blogs for advice, planning issues and the latest investment, market and economic updates from leading investment houses.

Alex Clare

28/06/2024

Team No Comments

EPIC Investment Partners: Daily Update – Economic Challenges Loom as 2024 Unfolds

Please see below, EPIC Investment Partners daily market summary which covers their views on global markets and economies and was received yesterday (26/06/2024):

As we near the second half of 2024, the global economy finds itself at a crossroads, balancing optimism for a soft landing with persistent challenges. The World Bank’s upgrade to its global growth forecast to 2.6% for 2024 reflects a cautiously optimistic outlook, with the United States remaining a key driver of global economic resilience. 

However, the US economy is showing signs of deceleration. Real GDP growth is projected to slow to 1.5% in 2024, down from 3.1% in 2023. Consumer spending, which has been a cornerstone of economic strength, is weakening as households deplete savings and face rising loan delinquencies. The labour market is also expected to soften, with unemployment potentially rising to 4.5% by year-end. 

Inflation remains a central concern. The Fed anticipates core PCE inflation at ~2.8% for 2024, above its 2% target. This persistent inflation has led to a more hawkish stance, with the central bank projecting a higher funds rate of 5.1% for 2024. Despite this, markets still expect two 25bps rate cuts in 2024, priced in from September. 

The political landscape adds another layer of complexity. The upcoming US election in November could significantly impact trade, tax, defence, and immigration policies. With the US government already spending as if the nation is in deep depression (clearly underpinning inflation), the US is facing a severe debt crisis as national debt nears USD 35tn and is increasing rapidly. Interest payments alone now consume around USD 1tn annually, surpassing many crucial programme budgets. Despite acknowledgment from past and present politicians, effective action remains absent. The only viable path forward is to curb government spending, limiting increases to below average economic growth. However, political will for such measures is lacking, risking severe future economic consequences. 

Financial markets appear to be pricing in a near-perfect scenario. The S&P500 has reached multiple new highs in 2024, and volatility remains low. The 10-year US Treasury yield, while fluctuating, appears to be stabilising given reduced expectations for Fed rate cuts. The US dollar maintains its strength, underpinned by the Fed’s cautious approach and its safe-haven status. 

However, risks loom on the horizon. The full impact of previous interest rate hikes may still be unfolding. The persistence of above-target inflation continues to challenge policymakers. Market volatility could increase as the US election approaches, with potential implications for global trade and economic policies. 

As we move through the latter half of 2024, the global economy walks a tightrope. Central banks’ abilities to navigate the delicate balance between stabilising inflation and supporting economic growth will be crucial. While a global soft landing remains possible, the path forward is fraught with uncertainties. Policymakers, businesses, and investors will therefore need to remain vigilant, adapting to a rapidly evolving economic landscape. As always, flexibility and careful risk management will be key to navigating these uncertain economic waters. 

Please continue to check our blog content for advice, planning issues and the latest investment, market and economic updates from leading investment houses.

Carl Mitchell – DipPFS

Independent Financial Adviser

27/06/2024

Team No Comments

Brewin Dolphin – Markets in a Minute

Please see this weeks Markets in a Minute update below from Brewin Dolphin, this analyses the difference in recent performance between U.S. and European equities:

Last week markets were reasonably positive, with stocks and bonds generally higher. But this sentiment has shifted slightly over the past few days as investors reflect on high valuations in some areas of the market.

The improvement in bond markets followed benign inflationary data released by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics the week before last. This firmed investors’ expectations that the next move in interest rates will be down rather than up.

But around that theme, there were differences in bond market performance. At a time when national finances are stretched and there’s an unprecedented number of elections taking place, political factors are likely to be important.

Populism and bond turmoil: The French connection

We still have months to go until the U.S. election, but in Europe, voting will be taking place much sooner. The French bond market in particular has been adjusting awkwardly to new political uncertainty.

The poll-leading National Rally party spent the 2022 presidential election pledging to slash VAT on energy, exempt the under-30s from income tax, and allow retirement at the age of 60 for many workers, with only reduced immigration and a clamp-down on fraud as potential means of funding these enormous tax cuts/spending increases.

Also riding high in the polls is the New Popular Front, an alliance of left-wing parties that also advocates a big fiscal expansion. This has seen a rise in French borrowing costs as investors try to discern the likelihood of these policies coming to pass.

Since calling the election, the polls continue to suggest populist parties that have made unrealistic spending pledges will win the largest share of the vote. The historical evidence would suggest they’ll moderate their plans once in office. To be fair, it’s true of almost all parties, whether populist or establishment, that their commitments reflect more wishful thinking than firm policy promises; it’s just that the difference between aspiration and outcome is likely to be far starker with the populists.

Reality check: A French revolution

It’s possible the new French government attempts to enact its fiscal largesse – in which case, we could see a bond market revolt. It might be tempting to call this a repeat of the Liz Truss mini-budget, but even in that instance, the most likely ultimate outcome is a chastened government conducting a policy u-turn.

Ultimately, the Truss government in 2022, the populist Italian coalition government in 2018, and French President Mitterand in 1983 all succumbed to more conventional fiscal policy under pressure from the market.

Is the UK banking on a change?

In the UK, we’re just over a week away from the election and the polls continue to favour the Labour party by a historic margin. The government heralded some good economic news last week, as the inflation rate declined and public finances improved.

If you recall, one of the arguments in favour of holding the election early was that there was a very strong chance of an improvement in inflation numbers in this last release before polling day. The prime minister can now demonstrate inflation has returned to target, but he can be less confident about the path of prices thereafter.

Another reason to bring the election forwards was that there was no longer a rationale to wait and deliver more tax cuts in an autumn budget. Does the good news on public finances released on Friday change that? Not really. Although it means the UK is no longer borrowing more than the Office for Budget Responsibility had forecast on a cumulative basis this year – the meaningful fiscal pressure remains. Neither main party seems likely to be able to meet its manifesto commitments without finding new tax revenue after the election due to the unrealistically low departmental spending budgets that have been forecast.

Coming back to the inflation numbers, and they showed the inflation rate returning to target. However, much of that’s a reflection of volatile price movements in food and energy, which are considered outside of the Bank of England’s gift to influence.

Core inflation runs at 3.5%, well above target. And the services category, which could be considered to reflect wage inflation, was particularly sharp. Services prices rose by 5.7% over the last year and 0.6% over the last month alone. There was little within this print to justify a cut in interest rates.

Nevertheless, when the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) met last week to consider interest rate policy, it clearly felt the case for a cut was building. Two members voted for a cut outright, and the minutes of the meeting reveal a discussion about this troublesome services inflation.

Of the seven remaining members, “some” felt that services inflation indicated that inflationary pressure remains. “Some” is MPC speak for two to three members. It’s distinct, for example, from “several”, which would mean three to four members.

The others were less troubled by services inflation, believing it to be driven by temporary factors like the seasonal increase in the national living wage. These “others” would seem sufficient, if added to the two currently proposing a cut, to reach a majority, and the wisdom of the markets now implies there’s a 60% chance of rates being cut in August.

But if these members feel that way, why are they not cutting now? Clearly, they need to see some further evidence of inflation slowing or the economy weakening between now and then.

A fly in the ointment of the improving inflation story is the persistence of some alternative measures of inflation. We calculate the median monthly inflation move to give a more stable indication of underlying inflationary pressure.

Since 2021, this measure has exceeded the 0.2% that would be consistent with the Bank of England’s inflation target. An improvement in this metric would seem a necessary precondition to inflation staying close to target.

Things can only get better?

In the absence of moderating services inflation, why do people feel comfortable expecting interest rate cuts? Because the economy is slowing. The key evidence for this comes from the labour market, but the data is inconclusive, and key measures like redundancies certainly suggest that employment is not collapsing.

Meanwhile, consumers have been recovering from postpandemic inflation and are now beginning to increase spending. National Insurance has been cut, which increases their post-tax incomes, and survey evidence suggests consumers have replenished their savings with wages outstripping price growth for a few quarters.

This was reflected in Friday morning’s retail sales numbers for May, which were quite strong. A combination of better weather than in April, income growth, rebuilt savings and lower goods prices have enticed consumers back to the shops.

Hopefully, nothing happens to upset the improving national mood, but with an election and the European Football Championship taking place over the next fortnight, it could be an emotional time.

Please continue to check our blog content for advice, planning issues and the latest investment market and economic updates from leading investment houses.

Andrew Lloyd DipPFS

26/06/2024

Team No Comments

EPIC Investment Partners – The Daily Update | Europe’s Competitive Crisis: A Call for Strategic Action

Please see today’s daily update from EPIC Investment Partners received this morning:

Europe finds itself at a critical juncture, grappling with a severe competitive crisis that threatens its long-standing position in the global market. For the past two decades, the continent has struggled to keep pace with productivity growth in the United States, facing what experts term a “competitiveness crisis.” This predicament stems from a complex interplay of economic, technological, and geopolitical challenges. 

At the heart of Europe’s economic woes lies a combination of structural issues, including labour market rigidities, high taxation, and regulatory burdens. High public debt, particularly in Southern Europe, constrains fiscal flexibility and limits public investment. Additionally, an ageing population places increasing pressure on social welfare systems, further complicating economic stability. These are some of the issues we highlighted ahead of the European Debt Crisis, and some of the main reasons we launched the Next Generation Bond Strategy. We believe that a nation’s economic growth is under pressure once the ageing population grows whilst at the same time the working age population shrinks. These pressures can arise despite improvements in technology and productivity.  

In the technological arena, Europe lags the US and China, especially in crucial sectors such as digital technologies, artificial intelligence, and biotechnology. Lower investment in research and development hampers innovation, reducing Europe’s ability to lead in new technological advancements. This technological gap is exacerbated by the slower pace of digital transformation in European businesses and public services. 

Geopolitical tensions add another layer of complexity to Europe’s challenges. Trade disputes, political turmoil, and rising protectionism create uncertainties for European businesses. Energy dependence, particularly on Russian imports, exposes the continent to security risks and price volatility. Moreover, Europe’s influence in global economic governance is waning compared to the growing clout of China and the sustained dominance of the US. 

A critical issue often overlooked is the sharp decline in foreign direct investment (FDI) flowing into Europe. FDI inflows have plummeted below their 2017 peak, with economic powerhouses like Germany and Britain suffering sharp contractions in recent years. This decline in FDI could prove disastrous as Europe seeks to secure more resilient supply chains and avoid its own “China shock.” 

To address these multifaceted challenges, Europe must adopt a more strategically assertive mindset. This may include implementing policies similar to China’s mercantilist strategies, such as mandating technology transfer through joint ventures for foreign companies seeking market access. Additionally, initiatives like the European Green Deal and the Digital Single Market aim to foster sustainable growth and enhance digital infrastructure. 

Ultimately, addressing Europe’s competitive crisis requires coordinated efforts at both national and EU levels, along with proactive policies to adapt to the rapidly changing global landscape. By tackling these challenges head-on, Europe can strive to regain its competitive edge and ensure long-term prosperity. 

Please continue to check our blog content for the latest advice and planning issues from leading investment firms.

Charlotte Clarke

25/06/2024

Team No Comments

Tatton Investment Management – The Monday Digest

Please see the below article from Tatton Investment Management providing their insights into global markets over the past week. Received this morning.

Stock market highs don’t feel so high.

Even though global stocks reached another all-time, the mood feels subdued. This is partly seasonal – a US national holiday and June’s option expiry date distorted trading – but partly because growth is so uneven. US business sentiment surveys showed surprising strength yet again, while European firms’ sentiment languishes under political risk.

Even US markets are uneven. Nvidia briefly became the world’s biggest company by market cap and has accounted for more than a third of the S&P 500’s year-to-date returns. This isn’t a classic valuation bubble, though: investors seem to have just reluctantly accepted it’s the only one that can make big money no matter what. The AI rally has been phenomenal, but it isn’t yet growing productivity or living standards outside of tech giants like Nvidia. This might explain why Americans feel so negative about their economy despite decent aggregate data. Soft patches mean the Fed can cut rates in the Autumn, but it would be a shame if all this does is add another few more billion to Nvidia’s market cap.

The Bank of England left interest rates unchanged, but strongly hinted it would cut in August. Markets aren’t fully convinced but, after headline inflation dropped to 2%, it would upset things if the BoE didn’t. The UK’s election outcome also looks like a done deal, and this policy certainty is coinciding with improved growth prospects. This stands in contrast to deep uncertainty in France, which is why sterling has gained against the euro.

Going east, Japan’s yen is still the weakest currency, though, thanks to its incredibly easy financial conditions. The Bank of Japan wants corporates to invest, but the country’s private sector seems to have forgotten how. This is a problem for China too, as the renminbi’s loose dollar peg means it has appreciated around 10% versus the yen this year. Chinese financial conditions are remarkably tight, despite the economy needing support.

A renminbi devaluation would therefore be reasonable, but is politically difficult, both domestically and among US politicians. China’s weak economy means it needs to play nice. That should be good for the global economy but, like everything else, is a mixed bag.

Markets unfazed by Labour’s lead.

Polls and betting markets suggest a Labour victory in July 4th’s election is a done deal. Since the stereotype is that markets prefer Conservative rule, some have blamed politics for the FTSE 100’s underperformance over the last month.

That is a stretch. The FTSE 100 is dominated by large commodity multinationals and banks, so is much more influenced by global growth than domestic politics. Global growth expectations were strong earlier in the year – and the FTSE outperformed – but they are weaker now, and the FTSE is underperforming.

Investor anxieties about Labour are mainly around tax rises – but the party has ruled these out for income tax, national insurance, VAT and corporation tax, and Paul Johnson of the IFS calls the party’s planned rises “trivial”. Nothing in Labour’s communications or the market reaction leads us to doubt that.

Kier Starmer and his party have been much cagier about capital gains tax (CGT), though. A majority of voters think he will hike it, according to a Telegraph poll, and CGT does feel like the most politically viable source of extra funds. An increase could hit some private equity funds, though they would probably just move tax bases. It will probably boost demand for more tax-efficient investment structures too. After Rishi Sunak lowered the threshold for taxable gains in April, for example, our fund of funds wrapped portfolio structure saw increased demand.

All this has a pretty minimal effect on the value of investments, though. That tends to be decided by the real economy rather than the tax outlook. UK large cap will continue to be driven by global affairs, while small caps will be driven by domestic growth. On that front, Goldman Sachs see a small boost to demand from Labour’s slightly more expansive fiscal policy. But realistically there will not be much of a difference – given Labour’s plans to strengthen the Office for Budget Responsibility. Markets think there is little scope for surprises.

Commercial Real Estate: risks and potential recovery

Commercial real estate (CRE) is struggling. These troubles have thankfully not spread to the financial sector – as many thought they would after the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank last year – but risks are simmering rather than cooled entirely. $2tn worth of US CRE debt is set to mature in the next three years. $670bn of this is “potentially troubled”, according to Barry Gosin of brokerage firm Newmark. As such, banks will have “to liquidate their loans or find other ways to reduce their weight in real estate”.

Higher interest rates hit CRE with the double whammy of squeezing their leverage and dampening property values. Firms will probably have to refinance at harsher rates, as US rate cuts have been repeatedly delayed this year. $929bn will mature in 2024 alone. Banks might be forced to offload the debt at a discount, due to post-financial-crisis regulations.

That could mean opportunity for those buying the debt. In January, the billionaire founder of Zara expanded his personal stake in CRE via a “buy the dip” strategy. CRE prices are hardly recovering strongly this year, but the sector seems to be over the worst of its troubles.

The CRE market is seemingly in limbo – beyond the worst of its problems but lacking the positive momentum to truly rebound. Goldman Sachs summed this up last month as CRE debt being “volatile, dispersed, but not systemic”. Interestingly, Goldmans points out that current growth in lending to CRE is being driven by smaller banks. Falling US rates, which markets currently expect in September, would support this.

That should bring back some investment demand, helping the more resilient companies. CRE conditions are still tough but, compared to a year ago, the threat CRE stress poses to the wider financial system looks minimal.

Please continue to check our blogs for advice, planning issues and the latest investment, market and economic updates from leading investment houses.

Alex Clare

24/06/2024

Team No Comments

The Daily Update | From Central Banks to NFA Predictions

Please see below ‘Daily Update’ article received from EPIC Investment Partners earlier this afternoon, which provides global economic analysis.

The Bank of England (BoE) maintained interest rates at 5.25%, as widely anticipated, despite headline inflation reaching the 2% target in May. Governor Bailey said: “It’s good news that inflation has returned to our 2% target. We need to be sure that inflation will stay low and that’s why we’ve decided to hold rates at 5.25% for now.” 

The BoE’s primary concern, mirroring its US counterpart, is persistent service inflation, which only marginally decreased to 5.7% from 5.9% in April. The central bank attributed part of these increases to regulated prices and volatile components, rather than underlying inflationary pressures. 

As in the previous meeting, seven Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) members favoured maintaining rates, while two advocated for a 25bps cut. However, this decision was described as “finely balanced,” suggesting a more nuanced discussion around potential rate cuts. 

The MPC meeting minutes revealed stronger-than-expected economic growth, the BOE forecast 0.5% GDP growth in Q2 2024, up from the 0.2% projected in May. This growth, partly driven by increased government spending, marks a clear recovery from last year’s recession. However, MPC members expressed concerns about persistent wage growth potentially leading to further price increases, and the risk of rising energy prices in autumn contributing to higher inflation. 

The MPC’s subtle shift in guidance, focusing more on the August forecast round rather than immediate data releases, indicates a more forward-looking approach. This change suggests the committee may be becoming less reactive to short-term data fluctuations and more focused on broader trends. 

Barring significant surprises in June’s inflation data, the BoE could commence its easing cycle in August. Markets are currently pricing in a ~70% chance of a cut in August, up from ~30% ahead of the BoE announcement.  

The upcoming change in MPC personnel, with Broadbent’s departure and the more hawkish Clare Lombardelli’s arrival, introduces an element of uncertainty that could influence the timing of the first cut. 

In other news, the Swiss National Bank (SNB) reduced rates by 25bps to 1.25%, marking its second cut this cycle. Unlike many Western countries, Switzerland’s inflation has fallen below 2%, stagnating at 1.4% in May. Of note, the SNB expressed willingness to intervene in the foreign exchange market, given the recent surge in the franc amid European political uncertainty. 

Remember our Net Foreign Asset (NFA) model that we use to predict Euro success? Well, it’s been a mixed bag. While the wealthy nations have largely triumphed, a few upsets have left our Fixed Income team scratching their heads. Belgium (6 star NFA) fumbled against Slovakia (2 star), but they’ve got another shot at glory against Romania (2 star) this weekend. Meanwhile, our model suggests the Netherlands (7 star) should outshine France (3 star) tonight, despite the latter being one of the tournament favourites. Will the Dutch make it rain Oranje, or will the French prove that football prowess is not about wealth? 

Please check in with us again soon for further relevant content and market news.

Chloe

21/06/2024