Team No Comments

Please see below, an article from WH Ireland which discusses the upcoming US employment data and the implication for markets. Received today – 06/11/2026

The US publishes its October employment report later today, with unemployment expected to hold at 4.2 per cent. That headline has long helped guide the Federal Reserve’s assessment of pressure in the labour market. But the unemployment rate can fall because people stop looking for work, rather than because more people find employment.

Economists expect 65,000 additional jobs in the separate payroll survey. Yet jobs and workers are different things. Over the year to September, the number of jobs rose by almost half a million while the household survey recorded roughly half a million fewer people in work. How reassuring is low unemployment when fewer people are working?

The distinction starts with the arithmetic. The unemployment rate measures people without work who are actively seeking it as a share of the labour force. Retire, or abandon the search, and you disappear from both its numerator and denominator. The rate can improve without anyone finding a job. It counts unemployment among those still in the labour force, rather than measuring the proportion of Americans employed.

The annual comparisons illustrate the problem. Over the year to September, unemployment fell from 4.4 to 4.2 per cent, even as the household survey recorded fewer people in work. Both labour-force participation and the proportion of the population employed declined. The unemployment rate improved; the share of Americans working did not.

The surveys are not interchangeable. They cover different populations, household employment is volatile and population adjustments complicate annual comparisons. Someone holding two jobs can appear twice in payrolls but only once in the household employment count. That does not establish why the surveys have diverged. It does explain why additional jobs cannot automatically be equated with additional people working. Neither survey alone settles the question.

Retirement helps explain the divergence. Baby-boomer retirements and reduced immigration are slowing workforce growth, lowering the number of additional jobs needed to keep unemployment steady. Estimates vary with assumptions about immigration and participation. Nevertheless, payroll gains that once looked inadequate may now prevent unemployment from rising. Clearing that lower hurdle says less about economic strength than investors might assume.

Slower employment growth alone does not establish that demand is weakening. An economy adding fewer workers should create fewer jobs, while productivity gains can sustain output. Falling participation caused by retirement is different from workers abandoning unsuccessful searches. The question is whether recruitment is adjusting to labour supply or businesses are becoming less willing to employ available workers.

A low-hire, low-fire market makes the distinction harder to observe. Employers can retain staff while reducing recruitment, keeping unemployment subdued even as opportunities dwindle. Existing employees enjoy relative security; graduates, new entrants and job changers face a less forgiving market. Weakness appears first in the difficulty of getting hired, before it becomes visible in redundancies.

Pay growth also deserves attention. Economists expect annual hourly earnings growth to ease to 2.9 per cent. Alongside weak recruitment and any reduction in working hours, that would strengthen the case that labour demand is cooling. It would offer less reassurance about inflation driven by energy, tariffs or other supply constraints.

Higher interest rates cannot reverse retirement or replenish immigration. They can restrain spending, investment and hiring. The Fed risks applying further pressure if it mistakes labour scarcity for vigorous demand. Today’s report therefore deserves scrutiny beyond its headlines, particularly revisions, hours and participation among prime-age workers, which helps distinguish ageing from broader weakness. Low unemployment remains relevant. But when the proportion of Americans working is falling, it offers less reassurance than the headline suggests.

Please continue to check our blog content for the latest advice and planning issues from leading investment management firms.

6th November 2026

Alex Kitteringham